Madras HC: ChatGPT Can't Teach Law, Upholds In-Person Learning

The Madras High Court says AI tools like ChatGPT cannot teach the legal profession. This comes as the court set aside an order that allowed law students with attendance shortages to continue their courses. The court emphasized the need for physical education in classrooms. It observed that online classes are not a substitute for in-person learning. Justice SM Subramaniam and Justice N Senthilkumar stated that AI tools cannot be equated with a qualified teacher. They cannot teach integrity and morality, which are crucial for the legal profession. The court highlighted that legal education involves connecting with society and a commitment beyond just making money. Classroom debates and dynamic discussions are seen as essential for building legal ideas. This ruling underscores the importance of traditional classroom settings for developing future legal professionals.